Luca Turin, the renowned perfume critic and author of the seminal *Perfumes: The A-Z Guide*, has never shied away from expressing his opinions, often brutally honest and unapologetically contrarian. His pronouncements on fragrance houses have shaped the perceptions of countless perfume enthusiasts, and Givenchy, a house with a rich history and diverse portfolio, has been no exception to his critical lens. While some Givenchy fragrances have earned his praise, many, particularly within their feminine offerings, have been subjected to his sharpest critiques. This article will delve into Luca Turin’s assessment of Givenchy, exploring both the highs and lows according to his writings and reviews, examining his commentary on specific fragrances and attempting to understand his overall perspective on the house.
The "Disaster" of Givenchy Feminines: A Stark Assessment
Turin's assessment of Givenchy's feminine fragrances is, to put it mildly, damning. He famously described them as a "complete disaster," a statement that highlights the significant disconnect between the house's aesthetic presentation and the olfactory experience, according to his viewpoint. While acknowledging the often beautiful packaging – notably mentioning the bottle design of L'Interdit – he finds the fragrances themselves lacking in substance and artistry. This is not a dismissal based on personal preference; rather, it stems from his rigorous analytical approach, which prioritizes the complexity, originality, and longevity of a fragrance's composition. The "negligible fragrances" he refers to are not simply weak or fleeting; they lack, in his opinion, the structural integrity and creative depth that define a truly exceptional perfume. The various iterations of L'Interdit, considered variations within the same lineage, are not spared from this harsh criticism, suggesting a consistent failure to deliver on the promise of the brand's aesthetic.
Givenchy Gentleman Original: A Beacon in the Darkness?
In stark contrast to his views on the feminine line, Turin's assessment of Givenchy Gentleman Original reveals a different story. While specifics from his writings aren't readily available in the readily accessible online resources concerning this specific fragrance, the general tenor of his work suggests that a classic, well-constructed masculine fragrance would likely garner a more favorable review. Givenchy Gentleman Original, with its chypre-fougère DNA and its place as a foundational fragrance in the masculine perfume landscape, potentially fits the criteria he values: a strong composition, clear structure, and satisfying longevity. The absence of explicit criticism implies a level of respect, a significant divergence from his overall assessment of the Givenchy feminine portfolio.
Givenchy Part 1, Part 3, and the Search for Identity:
The references to "Givenchy Part 1" and "Givenchy Part 3" likely allude to specific periods or stylistic phases within the Givenchy fragrance history. Without the precise context of Turin's original writings, it's challenging to pinpoint his specific criticisms. However, it's plausible that these references highlight a perceived lack of cohesive identity or a stylistic inconsistency within the house's output. Turin's critical lens often focuses on the internal consistency and artistic vision of a perfume house. If he perceives a lack of direction or a jarring shift in style between different fragrance launches, it would likely reflect negatively on his overall assessment. The apparent division into "parts" might suggest a fragmentation of the brand's olfactory identity, leading to a less compelling and less impactful overall impression.
current url：https://ibwelx.j329e.com/all/luca-turin-givenchy-75737
dior sauvage edp strawberry chanel mademoiselle l'eau privee opinie